Categories of Delayed-type Hypersensitivity Drug Rashes
Common (>80%)
Exanthematous drug eruptions (aka morbilliform or maculopapular drug eruptions)
Appear 4-21 days after starting the drug
Patients with HIV or BMT are at increased risk
Rash appearance variable
Maculopapular or morbiliform eruptions - often characterized by pink-to-red macules and papules (often pruritic) that spread rapidly and may coalesce; scaling/peeling can occur with resolution of the exanthem
Usually begins on trunk, spreads to extremities, typically symmetric
Urticarial lesions, angioedema, fixed drug eruptions, photosensitivity are less common manifestations of drug eruptions
Urticaria is the most common skin manifestation of serum sickness; however, the presence of maculopapular lesions on the sides of the fingers and toes or a serpiginous distribution of such lesions along the lateral aspects of both soles might be more specific
Fixed drug eruptions
Can present as eczematous lesions, papules, vesicles, or urticaria and occasionally involve the oral mucosa
Common anatomic locations include the lips, hands, and genitalia (especially males)
Often appear round or oval, sharply demarcated, red to livid, slightly elevated plaques ranging from a few mm to cm in diameter
Typically occur within 1-2 wks of drug exposure but might recur more rapidly with re-exposure
Erythema multiforme major
Target lesions with or without blisters
Compared to SJS, causes symmetric, mainly acral lesions, and mucosal involvement is less severe and less frequently involves 2 or more mucosal lesions
Occurs mainly after HSV infection and less frequently is drug induced, and the prognosis is usually benign
Acneiform
Pruritus
Uncommon
Acanthosis nigricans
Alopecia
Aphthous stomatitis
Black hairy tongue
Bullous eruptions
Erythema nodosum
Exfoliative dermatitis
Gingival hyperplasia
Lichenoid eruptions
Lupus erythematosus
Phototoxic/photoallergic
Pigmentation
Pityriasis rosea–like eruptions
Psoriasis
Purpura
Vasculitis
Severe
AGEP
Rare, begins with erythema or edema in the intertriginous areas or face followed by generalized fine nonfollicular sterile pustules. Fever, neutrophilia, and eosinophilia can also be present.
Should be distinguished from other causes of infectious pustules, such as candidiasis, gonococcemia, impetigo, and bacterial folliculitis
SJS/TEN
Large scale epidermal death (mucous membrane erosions, target lesions, and epidermal necrosis with detachment), almost always drug-induced
Hallmarks include fever (universal), conjunctivitis, pharyngitis, pruritis, painful skin
SJS is usually classified as <10% BSA involvement, TEN >30% BSA, 10-30% is overlap syndrome
High = point estimate relative risk ≥ 10 and significant and/or incidence ≥1 per 10,000 users
Mid = point estimate of relative risk ≥ 5 and < 10 and significant
SA = Suspected association based on detection of genetic association of increased risk of hypersensitivity reactions to this drug which is highly likely to include cases of DRESS with this drug or ≥ 5 suspect cases
†Whites ‡Han Chinese and/or other non-Japanese Asians §Japanese ¶ pooled estimate for all antiepileptic drugs listed below
Gold: lichenoid features, may progress to erythroderma
Bleomycin
Penicillin
Chloramphenicol
Quinine
Beta-blocker
Methyldopa
Clonidine
Diagnosis
H&P alone is often sufficient
Signs of a serious drug rash that should always be identified:
Lab Testing (Pichler)
LFTs - in patients with severe/generalized maculopapular rashes, 25% will have liver inflammation
CBC/diff
Eosinophilia (>0.6 g/L) is common (50%) and typical for delayed drug hypersensitivity
Presence of activated atypical lymphocytes is a sign of severe delayed drug hypersensitivity reaction (also seen in acute EBV, acute HIV, acute Still's disease)
BUN/Cr may demonstrate renal involvement
CRP may be normal or elevated
Lymphocyte transformation tests are specific but not sensitive
Skin Biopsy
When diagnosis is less clear, biopsies can aid in differentiating vasculitis, bullous diseases, and contact dermatitis
Note that there are no absolute histologic criteria for the diagnosis of drug-induced eruptions, and biopsy might not definitively exclude alternative causes
Histopathologic features of interface dermatitis, spongiosis, and tissue eosinophilia are not specific and can be seen with other cutaneous diseases.
Best lesions to biopsy are evolving or recent skin lesions, and the biopsy should be performed at the edge of the lesion
Immunofluorescence stains are important in the evaluation of bullous lesions
Table of Contents
Categories of Delayed-type Hypersensitivity Drug Rashes
Comparison
Onset of Delayed Drug Rashes (Pichler)
Drug-HLA-Severe Rash Associations
High = point estimate relative risk ≥ 10 and significant and/or incidence ≥1 per 10,000 users
Mid = point estimate of relative risk ≥ 5 and < 10 and significant
SA = Suspected association based on detection of genetic association of increased risk of hypersensitivity reactions to this drug which is highly likely to include cases of DRESS with this drug or ≥ 5 suspect cases
†Whites ‡Han Chinese and/or other non-Japanese Asians §Japanese ¶ pooled estimate for all antiepileptic drugs listed below
Drug-Reaction Associations
Diagnosis
Lab Testing (Pichler)
Skin Biopsy
Drug Challenge
Drug Rash Likelihood Algorithm (Stern)
References